Yeah right you wanna reach out to the other side.... is that why he resorts to the flat tax and then labels those who disagrees with him as socialist... not the best start Beck. I can't wait till he explains how a flat tax benefits NJ business/ taxpayers. Should be fun.. all the best Eric.

Patrick my good man....Rush Holt is a socialist and responsible for NJ residents sending more money to Washington and getting little if any back. I wish even another Democrat would challenge him.

All incumbents must be voted out of office until they are willing to work together. We are sending the wrong message when we continue to re-elect the same people and expect different results. This is not about party, but about effecting real change in Congress. If the electorate sent the "throw the bums out" message to congress, I guarantee they would change. A vote for the incumbent is a vote for MORE OF THE SAME.

Holt is responsible ? How about New York. PA, Mass etc...why dont you just display your ignorance further...and a socialist. Frankly I'm tired of the term. It's the sign you have no argument against so you label. Holtt is no more socialist then you. End of...

Patrick, you are right. (I am RIGHT is WRONG.)

Many incumbents have been irresponsible and certainly some of them have caused the terrible gridlock our government is experiencing right now. We can hope that the Tea Party incumbents and the Republicans in Democrat clothing will be ousted.

But Rush Holt is truly a Representative of the people of our district. And he is dedicated to doing what is best for America and the American people. No, he is not perfect. No, I don't always agree with him. But I believe he is honest and I believe he deserves yet another term representing me. And us.

NO, Mr. Beck. I do NOT want a businessman running things. Certain businessmen and women are ruining education in New Jersey. Others are depleting the environment. Business is all too often interested in short term profit, not the well-being of people.

This "job creator" thing needs a rest. That is business-speak for "Give me the money and I'll maybe trickle a little down to you." Forget it. Read Naomi Klein's book The Shock Doctrine. And if you care about education, read Diane Ravitch's book The Death and Life of the Great American School System.

At this point the Republican talking points are dangerous to our country. Think Brave New World. Modern day Democrats -- including Rush Holt -- are NOT "anti-business." They just want to prevent a return of the 'Gilded Age' where business held almost all the cards and the rest of the people held next to none.

I agree with Morrigan and Patrick. Any time you hear some right wing GOPer say that he wants smaller government, a flat tax or lower taxes (on the rich), WATCH OUT. Any one remember how Bush said he would be the CEO president and run America like a business? Riiight, he ran America just like ENRON, right into the ground. He cut taxes mainly benefiting the rich and blew a huge hole in the budget creating gigantic deficits. He even cut taxes during a time of war; no other president had done that. Beck is a despicable libertarian Ayn Rand type of right wing GOPer. This is the big problem with the US today: one party has become so extreme, so radical that compromise and congeniality has become impossible. For the record, Francis Bellamy was indeed a socialist, a Christian socialist. He wrote the sermon, Jesus the Socialist and THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Holt is not a socialist and he will get my vote. I don't believe in this silly nonsense that you should vote everyone out. Holt is doing a good job and Beck is a radical freak, no contest.

I've asked this before and didn't receive one response....but i did get the usual personal attacks from the left wing loons....

1. Name three bills Holt sponsored and were passed that had a direct and measurable benefits to NJ citizens

2. Name three things Holt has accomplished to improve the quality of life for hardworking middle class NJ residents.

3.Name three initiatives that Holt has achieved in creating jobs and lowering taxes. 

@I am right:
I didn't realize you were in the voting booth with me all these decades that I have been voting. Have you mastered the fine art of invisibility or are you clairvoyant? Patrick is right, Beck is talking out of both sides of his two mouths. In one breath he's talking about congeniality and in the next breath he's red baiting with the socialism charge. Talk about being a lying hypocritical hypocrite. This is the new McCarthyism, calling someone a socialist. It's red meat for the know nothings and the ill informed.

JoeR why the personal attackes against Beck? Where's the civil discourse Donna Brazile asked for?

Weak on US security..

Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism. (Sep 2001)
Voted NO on continuing intelligence gathering without civil oversight. (Apr 2006)
Voted NO on federalizing rules for driver licenses to hinder terrorists. (Feb 2005)
Voted NO on continuing military recruitment on college campuses. (Feb 2005)
Voted NO on adopting the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. (Oct 2004)

Off the top of your head, can you tell me what Scott Garrett has done for humanity?

Patrick...please answer my question. I dont care what he said or what you think he said. I want specific things...name them...that he has accomplished. I want proof that he is doing his rather than him or you saying he did his job.

More proof that Holt says one thing but does another when it comes to reducing the cost of healthcare for the average hard working private sector employee. It seems he votes for increase costs and to support trial lawyers more than for NJ residents!

• Voted NO on limiting medical malpractice lawsuits to $250,000 damages. (May 2004)
• Voted NO on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs. (Jul 2003)
• Voted NO on small business associations for buying health insurance. (Jun 2003)
• Voted NO on capping damages & setting time limits in medical lawsuits. (Mar 2003)
• Voted NO on subsidizing private insurance for Medicare Rx drug coverage. (Jun 2000)
• Voted NO on establishing tax-exempt Medical Savings Accounts. (Oct 1999)

Patrick my friend,
Thanks for proving the point Rush Holt must GO! The link you provided proves the case that he has accomplished nothing in his tenure as our Congressman. For him to use these crumbs as proof of accomplishments further shows his disconnect with taxpayers trying to pay their bills, keep their jobs and take care of their families.
1. Over 42,000 letters that he personally read and responded to? That’s over 40 per day 365 days a year…physically impossible. Plus how can he do this while watching Jeopardy?
2. He visited a school garden, a local business and a couple of high schools? These are not accomplishments they are well…things he did to get a photo op to help him get reelected.
3. He helped only one resident…one…. with a $3,500 tax refund. What about all of our tax dollars going to DC and we get the lowest return of any state. And he takes credit for $3,500 is he serious?
4. Expedited a residents passport – “A” resident…”one” resident…is he serious???

Please answer my question…what has Holt done for NJ taxpayers?

I answered the questions about Rush Holt more than a year ago when Winston was Steve, when he was white. Now as Winston, he's black. I answered all your questions more than a year ago and you just blew it off as nothing because you are a rabid irrational knee-jerk Holt hater. There's no reasoning with you, Winston/Steve. This is deja vue all over again. I demand to know what did Rush Holt ever do!! Answer my questions, ANSWER MY QUESTIONS, I AM THE IMPERIAL winston, attention must be paid! Blah, blah, blah. If Rush Holt could walk on water and solve the national debt single-handedly, Winston/Steve would still attack, attack and attack some more.

Patrick the issue is what has Holt done. Why are you changing the subject and nstead attacking Republicans?

WHY CANT YOU JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION?

It will be great to have a South Brunswick resident in Congress.

This could be the beginning of new members on the town council as well.
If what Congress is doing isn't working, isn't it time for a change? Why is everyone afraid of change?

Oh, how wonderful, a change for the worse. Whoopee. Talk about ideology. I am right has the right wing ideology down pat. Holt is a great congressman doing a great job and you want to dump him for some regressive super right wing dork who spouts all the Tea Party nonsense. Trickle down never worked, it was an abject failure. Lowering taxes on the rich lead to the crash of 2008 and 9% unemployment. You show your true colors, I am right. Why would you be gleeful for a demagogue like Beck? Are you an Ayn Rand fan?

JoeR - Why cant you prove or support your delusion that "Holt is a great congressman doing a great job." I posted facts showing he has accomplished NOTHING and his own office cannot find ONE accomplishment that has helped the citizens of South Brunswick.

I am RIGHT, have you ever heard the expression, "throwing the baby out with the bath water?"

There are SOME do-nothing Congresspeople in Washington. There are EVEN MORE do-something-that-hurts-America Congresspeople. I agree that we should get rid of them.

But there are experienced, moderate, thoughtful Congresspeople who should retain their seats. They're the ones who know the ropes in Washington and they know how to negotiate and get things done.

Despite Winston's 'facts' -- most of which are more accurately misrepresentations -- Rush Holt has the best interests of his constituents in mind. And the best interests of our country. I want someone who values intelligence, honesty and fairness to represent me in Congress. And that is Rush Holt.

Morrigan....misrepresentations? All I did was post his voting record and address propaganda published by his own office...how can you claim they are misrepresentations?

Well, what I mean by misrepresentation is taking a part of something and representing it as the whole thing.

For example, a bill may contain a rider that is unacceptable -- like anti-environmental provisions that were attached to a must-pass spending bill in 2011. Rush Holt had good reasons for opposing those bills you mentioned. Perhaps you ought to look into them.

Besides which, the votes you are talking about took place from 1999 to 2004. That represents the first third of his time as our Congressman. It is now 2012. He has cast over 9,000 votes since entering Congress.

As I said, I do not always agree with him. But he really thinks about these bills and votes according to what he believes is right. And he communicates with his constituents. Even when he and I disagree, after I hear his explanation, I have to agree that he has some valid points!

Vote all the bums out is a mindless bumper sticker. Each election is unique, the match up of candidates is also unique. I vote based on the particular candidates, their records and what they have to say. I will not be ruled by some mindless slogan or bumper sticker (Vote all dem bums out, hiccup - sounds like the rantings of boozed up bar room habitues). It's a case by case situation; to be hide bound and limited by a slogan is ridiculous. Holt is an effective intelligent congressman, he deserves to be returned to office. We have a duopoly, we have only 2 parties to choose from. The GOP has gone off the cliff into crazy land. It has morphed into a radical far right wing party. The Democratic party has become a moderate middle of the road party with just a few actual liberals or progressives left. I wish we had more choices. We don't need any more right wing parties because the GOP fits that bill and then some. But we do need an actual liberal, progressive workers party. We don't have that now. The Democrats give lip service to unions but have not done much in the way of union legislation. So you vote for the lesser of the evils in too many cases or don't vote and allow some Tea bagger/Ayn Randian/libertarian freakazoid gain office. No contest, I will vote for Holt who is not a lesser candidate...he's very good.

We need to change the behavior in Washington. If our "leaders" know they have to work or risk losing their jobs, they will learn to compromise. Then you can go back to evaluating candidates and voting accordingly. I don't care the party I'm voting all incumbents out.

Patrick...I am trying to remain civil but you and the Holt supporters refuse to answer the three questions I posted. Rather than change the subject and/or "move the cheese" can you simply answer the questions?

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billsearch.xpd?sponsor=400184

I am RIGHT:

We do need to change the behavior in Washington. Toss out the obstructionists.

As Joe said, voting all incumbents out is not a good idea. Really -- would you be willing to undergo surgery if all the surgeons in the hospital were first-year doctors? Would you choose for your kids to go to a school where all the teachers are first-year teachers? Would you go to have your car fixed at a place where all the mechanics were first-year mechanics?

Well, I do not want my laws made by a Congress full of first-year Congresspeople. Experience and knowhow count for something. And there are some members of Congress who deserve reelection. Rush Holt is one of them.

Winston.

I did answer your questions,

Here's what you wrote: "Morrigan....misrepresentations? All I did was post his voting record and address propaganda published by his own office...how can you claim they are misrepresentations?"

I wrote: "Well, what I mean by misrepresentation is taking a part of something and representing it as the whole thing.

For example, a bill may contain a rider that is unacceptable -- like anti-environmental provisions that were attached to a must-pass spending bill in 2011. Rush Holt had good reasons for opposing those bills you mentioned. Perhaps you ought to look into them."

I consider that an answer. And by the way, those votes helped more constituents than they might have hurt.

Well I rest my case...the best that the Holt supporters could come up with is that he visited a school, voted to increase our dependency on foreign oil, screwed small business owners, raise taxes and didn't answer questions from a distraught constituent. Well if that doesn't deserve our vote what does! Not even the most left wing of all his supporters could even build a rational case to justify him being in congress.

Beck for congress...actually anybody but Holt!

Winston yawns as his dimwitted opponent doesnt even realize that it's been over 12 hours and he still can't find one thing to support his blind love and suppoert for Holt the do nothing parasite in congress.

Bills sponsored by Holt in 2011:
HR131 Property Tax relief act of 2011
HR 132- Create Jobs by expanding the R&D tax credit act of 2011
HR 133 Creating jobs from innovative small businesses act of 2011HR
HR134 Making permanent the R&D tax credit act of 2011
HR 135 National STEM education tax incentive for teachers act of 2011
HR 492 Big Oil bailout prevention act of 2011
Holt co-sponsored literally hundreds of bills in 2011 alone. I'm not about to list all of them.

Who the heck died and selected Winston tyrant of the comments section? You don't get to dictate the terms of use, the frame, what should be discussed or how questions should be answered. You don't get to set the parameters of dialogue, you are not the boss of how I chose to answer your whining questions. Your questions (autocratic demands) have been answered by Patrick, Morrigan and me. You just ignore them and rant on. Do you not realize that a congressman's record is more than just what they do in the House of representatives, it also includes what they do for their constituents in their districts. It is more than fair to include those activities in his accomplishments. In case you don't know, Rush Holt is not dictator of the house, he can't make laws and enact bills all on his own. Winston acts as if Holt was or should be absolute czar of the house. He has to work with his peers, he has to compromise and he has to work against a radicalized extreme right wing GOP that has engaged in hyper obstructionism since Obama's been in office.

Some of Holt's accomplishments (it's not just what he does in the house that makes him effective):
Responding to 14,148 letters, phone calls, and emails from Mercer County residents who had shared their ideas and concerns. He personally read and replied to 42,295 constituent communications last year.
Helping secure $250,000 from the Department of Justice to provide temporary housing in Trenton for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Visiting the school gardens at Hopewell Elementary in Hopewell Borough to see how students are growing their own nutritious food, and writing a new law that will help create similar programs nationwide.
Expediting, in less than 24 hours, a Princeton Borough resident’s passport and visa approvals, allowing her to make a scheduled flight to Africa. She was among 1,825 New Jerseyans whom I helped cut through red tape in their dealings with federal agencies.

Holt accomplishments Continued:
Touring Homasote, a Ewing manufacturer engaged in innovative research to succeed in today’s economy. Holt introduced bills to create new tax credits for research-intensive small businesses and the investors that fund them.
Visiting with Lawrence students, teachers, and staff at Ben Franklin Elementary School and Lawrence Intermediate School – among 23 local school visits in 2011.
Intervening after an IRS error delayed a Pennington resident’s receipt of a $3,500 tax refund. The money was promptly refunded with interest.
Visiting with West Windsor students to find new ways to prevent school bullying. Holt joined Sen. Lautenberg to introduce legislation that strengthens anti-harassment and anti-bullying programs at colleges.

Hmmmm still no answers form Holts supporters.

Winston, since when is South Brunswick the only community in our district?

Do you not have the insight to understand that many of those bills that help people in our district also help people in South Brunswick? Do you not understand that those bills also help people in the rest of New Jersey, the rest of the United States?

Maybe those bills do not help the people who make money from cheating people, from desecrating the environment, and from creating desperation. But that's OK with me. Those people should probably be in jail, anyway.

Morrigan..you still are ignoring my questions...what has he done for SB? I don't care what he's done for Ewing or his donors in Princeton...no one can tell me why I should vote for him.

Its obvious that many left wing voters don't know why they vote for their candidates and are grossly uninformed. Rather than vote for the better candidate they only care about keeping their party in power...no matter how ineffective or impotent, like Holt, they might be...

I'm putting money on Winston countering with some sort of attack based on Solyndra.

How can you not vote for a South Brunswick resident to represent our district in The House? Are you that tied to a party? I think it will be great having a SB resident represent our district. More voters become unaffiliated everyday because of the rhetoric. I enjoy being part of the 20% that decides elections. Maybe one day you'll see the light.

@I am right:
What vacuum sealed alternate universe do you live in? I read what Beck had to say and it's appalling. And you are damn well right that I am opposed to the GOP.
Why would I vote for a party that:
Was against Social Security from day one and is still out to destroy it.
Was against Medicare and Medicaid from day one and is still dead set on destroying those 2 programs.
Was against a national health care system when Harry Truman proposed it in 1947.
Was opposed to the Clinton efforts for health care.
Was opposed to and is still trying to obstruct Obama care which is better than nothing.

continued....
The GOP is the party that has stood in the way of universal health care in this country. If not for the GOP we might have universal health care, instead we have 50 million uninsured. I will vote for a GOPer when hell freezes over because the party is regressive and opposed to science. This is the party that does not accept human caused global warming and is all jiggy with Creationism and Intelligent Design. The GOP has serious doubts about Darwin's theory of evolution. I will not support a rabidly pro super rich party (even worse than the Democrats who have become too corporate as well). Yes, I am opposed to the GOP, especially the GOP of 2012. I will vote Democratic because we don't have any other choices. Oh, and for good measure, the GOP is working over time to make abortions illegal and force women to return to back alley abortions. The GOP is opposed to me, I will reciprocate the favor.

I am RIGHT -- sadly, you are not right. The great majority of these right wing guys have no allegiance -- except to their masters. And their masters are not 'we, the people' even though we may have elected them -- their masters are the banksters and the corporatists.

If Mr. Beck were a moderate Republican on the order of Olympia Snowe, maybe. She really does listen. She really does think. And she has gotten in trouble with her Republican colleagues for bucking the party line because she does not always concur with their view on things.

But just from reading this article you can tell that Mr. Beck likely has more in common with the other Mr. Beck than with Rep. Snowe. Rep. Holt and President Obama are NOT anti-business. They are pro-fairness.

Mr. Beck speaks well of Governor Christie. He likes what the Governor has done. That in itself would be enough to make me question the wisdom of voting for him. Our governor has vilified public employees and unions, he is slowly strangling the public schools, and he chooses to enrich his friends at the expense of the rest of us.

Any police officer, any firefighter, any teacher, anybody who belongs to a union, anybody who cares about the education kids receive in New Jersey, anybody who cares about civility or fairness -- when they really take all of this into consideration, they will feel the same way

enough talk about Holt... You can look up his record and decide.
But here is Eric Beck interviewed.
http://vimeo.com/36933930

I'd vote for whatever person I thought would do a better job and represent their constituents better. I was really interested in what this Eric Beck had to say. I started feeling the guy a little and then he went all:
""We need to stop this class warfare we're seeing from the other side," he said. "It's un-American. We should be focused on trying to grow the economy and lifting all boats. It's interesting that the modern day Democratic Party is different from the prominent Democrat I worked with in former Sen. Paul Tsongas, who was a great advocate for the business community."
Are you serious? With all of the Tea Party clowns running around the country and causing a disruption for government and even their own party and he's still going to push all the blame on one side? Toss in the trickle down talk and his allegiance to business and I'm thinking this guy just sold me on anybody else. Republicans deserve just as much credit for dividing the social classes, and in many cases you can argue they have more of the blame for keeping the wealthy even more rich and the lowest even more poor. Sorry Eric. I gave you an honest chance and was hoping to like you, but you seem like one of the political clowns like Palin, Santorum, Corzine, and Obama.

Reallllllllyyyyyyy? Erp...burp....yawn.....

Oh yes I am sure your a non partisan open minded voter....in your Prius with your "my congressman is a rocket scientist" and "obama 2012" bumper stickers.

Funny...Holt is outed as a pay for favor 1%er and the drones ignore ang instead attack the messenger and the truth. Holt is the reason why politics is broken...he is a fraud and his blind moronic supporters don't care

Patrick Holts own personal financial disclosure states he has assets over $3.5 million. Not wealthy.....not a 1%er? Your rabid support for this do nothing....rated the most liberal member of congress.....is irrational and troubling.

While you scream politics is broken...the economic system is broken...you blindly support Holt one of the people responsible for destroying our political and economic system....very strange.

Hear this loud and clear, Winston --

The people most responsible for trying to destroy our political and economic system are the banksters and the corporatists. People in the private sector who want the freedom to run unfettered over the rest of us in order to obtain short-term profit.

They are aided and abetted primarily by those in government who signed Grover Norquist's pledge. Most if not all Republicans, and some Democrats. And -- advertently or inadvertently -- by the Tea Party.

Lots of Tea Party members think they're doing a good thing, doing a patriotic thing, and they do not realize that they are being played by folks like the Koch brothers. Others know exactly what they are doing.

Oh and Morrigan..you need to research your man Holts source of donations...while you believe he is fighting the big financial bad guys he admits taking money for the Investment Company Institute a pack funded by an army of hedge fund managers and bankers...Holt is the problem!

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgave2.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00105981

Why doesnt Holt support Israel?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7XNr8oLcn0&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Holt admits in his own words that he has done nothing for South Brunswick and voted for legislation not even knowing what he voted for....unedited video of his incompetence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvZ7DL4EMk0&feature=youtube_gdata_player

How can anyone support a congressman who is anti Israel, supports investment bankers over taxpayers and takes money from disgraced and corrupt companies?

Voted NO on limiting medical malpractice lawsuits to $250,000 damages. (May 2004)
• Voted NO on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs. (Jul 2003)
• Voted NO on small business associations for buying health insurance. (Jun 2003)
• Voted NO on capping damages & setting time limits in medical lawsuits. (Mar 2003)
• Voted NO on subsidizing private insurance for Medicare Rx drug coverage. (Jun 2000)
• Voted NO on establishing tax-exempt Medical Savings Accounts. (Oct 1999)

I applaud Holt on his votes, I agree with him. On the reimportation of drugs bill, there were other poison pills added to the bill that made it unacceptable. In any case, right wingers and most Gopers (a few Gopers are for it) are against reimportation of drugs.

So you applaud Holt fot limiting healthcare options, increasing premiums and increasing health taxes on American small business?

Your pro union bigotry is bizarre! His voting records proves he doesn't support job grwth or real healthcare reform.

Medical Savings accounts are great for the wealthy. They can stash many thousands in this TAX SHELTERED account. The poor and most of the middle class can barely survive from pay check to pay check. How are they supposed to put money into a medical savings accounts. Even if they could put $50 a week into the account ($2600) that would not last long with high medical expenses. Medical savings accounts are scams for the wealthy. They do litlle or nothing for the great mass of Americans.

I wish these comments had a 'LIKE' button.

So it's been 72 hours and the Holt supporters still cannot justify supporting him. I don't understand how left wing progressives can ignore the facts that holt is in the pocket of investment bankers, hedge fund managers and wealthy donors receiving corporate welfare.

I guess it's easier to attack the messenger than deal with reality.

Hmmm more proof of Holts history of giving special treatment and doing the bidding of his big donors...facts and more facts.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/2009/04/dirty-money-rep-rush-holt/103029

Gee..Holt even took money from the notorious Solomon Dwek....geesh when will it end!

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2009570857_apnjnjcorruptioncontributions.html

Ohhhhh noooo will he ever stop! Big donors say jump and Holt asks how high! More proof that he is in the pocket of big money donors. He takes the side of his donors over the interests of a New Jersey based business !

http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/big-labor-congressman-rush-holt-5262011

Winston, its been a day and a half and you still haven't exposed how Holt is " using our tax dollars for their own good while penalizing the hard working taxpayers of South Brunswick."

when did fairness, honesty and reality become subjective?

My only personality flaw is continuing to actually engage in this dysfunctional exchange.
Rush Holt and I have very similar politic... I asked you, who you admire. Who matches your politics. anyone? or are you just out there on an island. Maybe its time you actually answer a question.

Patrick, I wondered about that myself -- why was I continuing to engage in this discussion?

Part of the answer, I think, is that any undecided people who choose to read these posts will see the points that Winston and I am Right make against Rush Holt, and they will see the points that you and Joe and I make in support of him, and they will be able to judge for themselves.

Rob claimed that he had been open either way, and how his ideas had been affected by the article. middle of the road made some valid points and responded thoughtfully and courteously.

As I mentioned before, democracy by its nature is an imprecise and messy form of government. But it works if we allow it to. As Ben Franklin said, "You have a Republic -- if you can keep it!"

Morrigan well said...the only problem is that Holts supporters only reason for supporting him is that he is a Democrat. If he was Republican you and the other liberal dems would be screaming holy murder....instead you ignore the facts that he is a dupe for walls street, banks and rich donors.

I am still waiting for the answer to my questions.....

Thank you, Winston.

I will say that IF you think thoughtfulness, reason, intelligence, fairness and honesty are solely Democratic characteristics -- then yes, maybe you are right. But I think Olympia Snowe has those characteristics, and she is not a Democrat... Would I vote for her over Rush Holt? NO. His values are closer to mine than hers. But I would certainly vote for her over some of the other Democrats that are lawmakers in Washington!

I am generally not a Scripture-quoting individual, but it is Sunday and I think a paraphrase may be appropriate here (Luke 6 and Matthew 7):

Looking at the facts, I'd say most Republicans need to take the log out of their eye before berating the Democrats for the splinter in theirs.

That is an answer.

More proof that left wing liberalism is a mental disease. Hey I can understand....he's a deceitful hypocrite but he's you deceitful hypocrite!

Scripture please....if your were a real holt supporter you would know that he doesn't support religion in any public venue...since he was raised as an atheist we should expect that...

Holt must go! He a do nothing back bencher!