'Clean Slate' Challengers Oust Incumbents for Toms River School Board

Five-way race pitted two incumbents against three challengers

In a hotly contested race haunted by the Ritacco scandal, two Toms River Regional School Board incumbents fell to challengers campaigning as reformers under the "Clean Slate" banner.

Joseph Torrone and Ginny Rhine, who campaigned together as the "Clean Slate" team, had the most votes, defeating incumbents Jack Reuther and Gus Kakavas and challenger Charlotte Ford Spillane. Rhine and Torrone would serve three-year terms.

The unoffical results, with 96 percent of Toms River districts reporting:

  • Charlotte Ford Spillane, 7,820 votes, 18.48%
  • Gus Kakavas 8,840 votes, 20.89%
  • Ginny Rhine 9,918, 23.44%
  • Joseph G. Torrone 9,033, 21.35%
  • John Reuther 6,598, 15.59%
  • Write-In 104, 0.25%
  • Total: 42,313

South Toms River challenger wins

Longtime incumbent Jamie Jubert lost by 57 votes. Challenger Gidalty "Gigi" Esparza took the one seat representing South Toms River.

The school board, a regional one, has a seat for South Toms River, Pine Beach and Beachwood.

Gigi Esparza, 458 votes, 53.26 percent

Jamie Jubert, 401 votes, 46.63 percent

Write-in: 1 vote

860 votes total.

"Clean Slate" takes school board majority

With a victory of Torrone, Rhine and Esparza, the so-called "Clean Slate" team has a majority on the nine-member school board. Last year "Clean Slate" candidates Ben Giovine, Loreen Torrone and Alex Pavliv won.

The three are sometimes the lone dissenting votes on board matters, such as a vote on administrator contracts. But for 2013 the six board member will have a majority, leaving longtime incumbents Tom Baxter, Ed Gearity and Mike Jedzeniak as the minority.

Ritacco scandal remained an issue

The "Clean Slate" team of Torrone and Rhine campaigned strongly on "Ending the Ritacco Era," a message continued from a campaign last year that saw the election of current members Ben Giovine, Alex Pavliv and Lorreen Torrone.

Torrone and Rhine said many of the professionals and attitudes are still in place from the "Ritacco Era," referring to former superintendent Michael Ritacco, convicted of tax evasion relating to bribery in the school district for inflated insurance contracts and kickbacks.

Incumbents said the two years since Ritacco's arrest they have pushed for important reforms, such as ousting the old auditor and insurance broker. 

Challengers Torrone and Rhine pushed for stronger reforms and more transparency, hoping to televise or videotape school board meetings and create subcommittees along for more community and school board oversight.

Candidates focused on improving district in vardied ways

Spillane positioned herself as an experienced former administrator who worked with superintendents before Ritacco, and wanted to restore many programs since canceled, such as in-school suspension and a physical space for the Toms River Schools Hall of Fame.

Kakavas and Reuther said that they worked with Ritacco for a mere 10 months on the board and often disagreed with the man. Kakavas said it was unfair for challengers to say they were part of the "Ritacco Era."

Challenger Rhine, 32, said she ran because she saw an atmosphere of corruption that exited for years under Ritacco and continued today.

"I decided to run because I realized there were problems in our district.  But not until, I started running did I realize the extent of our problems.  I am shocked and appalled at the way our district has been managed both before Ritacco was indicted and since," said Rhine, who is a homemaker and former Advanced Placement teacher.

During the campaign, Reuther said he was apalled to find himself blasted as part of "The Ritacco Era," when he and Kakavas felt there pushed hard for reforms.

"It has been frustrating to be labeled the 'Ritacco Era' board member. Gus and I were on for 11 months when the FBI raided Superintendent Ritacco’s house," Reuther said.

Reuther ran for a second term because "There is still important work to be done. I have promised my wife that if I am re-elected I will serve 3 more years then pass the torch on to others."

Torrone, who is married to current board member Loreen Torrone, is a former superintendent of the Brielle district. He pledged to bring that experience to Toms River Regional, to both increase community participation in the district and also create better education, with a strong eye toward eliminating waste created in the "Ritacco Era."

First year of November elections

With longer voting hours and coupled with national race turnout, this was the first November voters saw a school board race on the ballot.

All Ocean County School Districts, with the exception of Lakewood, opted to move their School Board elections from April to November as a result of a bill signed into law by Governor Christie in January, which then Toms River Regional voted to move the election locally.

Usually polls in an April race opened later in the day, but moving the election to November also increased the number of polling hours.

It was the first year the Toms River Regional School District didn't have to work to ask voters to approve its school budget and tax levy.

JD November 07, 2012 at 11:11 PM
Giovine hasn't kept his promises... He will be a "1 and Done" if he doesn't change his voting... his votes don't match his rhetoric... he has done nothing to get rid of waste... he has voted Yes to the budgets without making cuts.... He says he favors a personel committee and is against nepotism... but he has voted Yes for everything on Roselli agenda... teachers, etc "the original JD"
Ken G November 08, 2012 at 02:31 AM
So the budget needs to be cut every year? No, Giovone and the rest of the clean slate team are what we need. It's better than buying new buildings, making lies, and helping a con man steal from students, and the public. I was not a fan of the old board of Ed, I like this new one.
GreatCthulhu November 08, 2012 at 03:59 AM
Nepotism like Mr. Torrone now joining his incumbent wife, Mrs, Torrone, on the school board?
TRman November 09, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Greatcthulhu. Is it Nepotism if they WON the office in a fair election for a non paying position? His wife didnt get him the job! Although it is odd to have a husband and wife on the board but not unprecedented. Good bye Jon and Gus its been real.
Robert Bressman November 09, 2012 at 10:02 PM
Now that the clean slate has the majority, I would hope they get rid of the $15,000 a year tax free annuity we pay our administrators, this is the biggest giveaway of taxpayer money and it's right in your face! They either accept a contract without out it or leave. This is just a start, but I'd like to see if the clean slate means business.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »